Route Resolved āœ…

Package: @imdb/name

Pattern: /name/[nconst]

Params: {"nconst":"nm0000008"}

SSR Data
{
  "nconst": "nm0000008",
  "name": {
    "id": "nm0000008",
    "nameText": {
      "text": "Marlon Brando"
    },
    "birthDate": {
      "dateComponents": {
        "year": 1924,
        "month": 4,
        "day": 3
      }
    },
    "deathDate": {
      "dateComponents": {
        "year": 2004,
        "month": 7,
        "day": 1
      }
    },
    "bio": {
      "plainText": "Marlon Brando is widely considered the greatest movie actor of all time, rivaled only by the more theatrically oriented Laurence Olivier in terms of esteem. Unlike Olivier, who preferred the stage to the screen, Brando concentrated his talents on movies after bidding the Broadway stage adieu in 1949, a decision for which he was severely criticized when his star began to dim in the 1960s and he was excoriated for squandering his talents. No actor ever exerted such a profound influence on succeeding generations of actors as did Brando. More than 50 years after he first scorched the screen as Stanley Kowalski in the movie version of Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) and a quarter-century after his last great performance as Col. Kurtz in Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now (1979), all American actors are still being measured by the yardstick that was Brando. It was if the shadow of John Barrymore, the great American actor closest to Brando in terms of talent and stardom, dominated the acting field up until the 1970s. He did not, nor did any other actor so dominate the public's consciousness of what WAS an actor before or since Brando's 1951 on-screen portrayal of Stanley made him a cultural icon. Brando eclipsed the reputation of other great actors circa 1950, such as Paul Muni and Fredric March. Only the luster of Spencer Tracy's reputation hasn't dimmed when seen in the starlight thrown off by Brando. However, neither Tracy nor Olivier created an entire school of acting just by the force of his personality. Brando did.\n\nMarlon Brando, Jr. was born on April 3, 1924, in Omaha, Nebraska, to Marlon Brando, Sr., a calcium carbonate salesman, and his artistically inclined wife, the former Dorothy Julia Pennebaker. \"Bud\" Brando was one of three children. His ancestry included English, Irish, German, Dutch, French Huguenot, Welsh, and Scottish; his surname originated with a distant German immigrant ancestor named \"Brandau.\" His oldest sister Jocelyn Brando was also an actress, taking after their mother, who engaged in amateur theatricals and mentored a then-unknown Henry Fonda, another Nebraska native, in her role as director of the Omaha Community Playhouse. Frannie, Brando's other sibling, was a visual artist. Both Brando sisters contrived to leave the Midwest for New York City, Jocelyn to study acting and Frannie to study art. Marlon managed to escape the vocational doldrums forecast for him by his cold, distant father and his disapproving schoolteachers by striking out for The Big Apple in 1943, following Jocelyn into the acting profession. Acting was the only thing he was good at, for which he received praise, so he was determined to make it his career - a high-school dropout, he had nothing else to fall back on, having been rejected by the military due to a knee injury he incurred playing football at Shattuck Military Academy, Brando Sr.'s alma mater. The school booted Marlon out as incorrigible before graduation.\n\nActing was a skill he honed as a child, the lonely son of alcoholic parents. With his father away on the road, and his mother frequently intoxicated to the point of stupefaction, the young Bud would play-act for her to draw her out of her stupor and to attract her attention and love. His mother was exceedingly neglectful, but he loved her, particularly for instilling in him a love of nature, a feeling which informed his character Paul in Last Tango in Paris (1972) (\"Last Tango in Paris\") when he is recalling his childhood for his young lover Jeanne. \"I don't have many good memories,\" Paul confesses, and neither did Brando of his childhood. Sometimes he had to go down to the town jail to pick up his mother after she had spent the night in the drunk tank and bring her home, events that traumatized the young boy but may have been the grain that irritated the oyster of his talent, producing the pearls of his performances. Anthony Quinn, his Oscar-winning co-star in Viva Zapata! (1952) told Brando's first wife Anna Kashfi, \"I admire Marlon's talent, but I don't envy the pain that created it.\"\n\nBrando enrolled in Erwin Piscator's Dramatic Workshop at New York's New School, and was mentored by Stella Adler, a member of a famous Yiddish Theatre acting family. Adler helped introduce to the New York stage the \"emotional memory\" technique of Russian theatrical actor, director and impresario Konstantin Stanislavski, whose motto was \"Think of your own experiences and use them truthfully.\" The results of this meeting between an actor and the teacher preparing him for a life in the theater would mark a watershed in American acting and culture.\n\nBrando made his debut on the boards of Broadway on October 19, 1944, in \"I Remember Mama,\" a great success. As a young Broadway actor, Brando was invited by talent scouts from several different studios to screen-test for them, but he turned them down because he would not let himself be bound by the then-standard seven-year contract. Brando would make his film debut quite some time later in Fred Zinnemann's The Men (1950) for producer Stanley Kramer. Playing a paraplegic soldier, Brando brought new levels of realism to the screen, expanding on the verisimilitude brought to movies by Group Theatre alumni John Garfield, the predecessor closest to him in the raw power he projected on-screen. Ironically, it was Garfield whom producer Irene Mayer Selznick had chosen to play the lead in a new Tennessee Williams play she was about to produce, but negotiations broke down when Garfield demanded an ownership stake in \"A Streetcar Named Desire.\" Burt Lancaster was next approached, but couldn't get out of a prior film commitment. Then director Elia Kazan suggested Brando, whom he had directed to great effect in Maxwell Anderson's play \"Truckline CafƩ,\" in which Brando co-starred with Karl Malden, who was to remain a close friend for the next 60 years.\n\nDuring the production of \"Truckline CafƩ,\" Kazan had found that Brando's presence was so magnetic, he had to re-block the play to keep Marlon near other major characters' stage business, as the audience could not take its eyes off of him. For the scene where Brando's character re-enters the stage after killing his wife, Kazan placed him upstage-center, partially obscured by scenery, but where the audience could still see him as Karl Malden and others played out their scene within the cafƩ set. When he eventually entered the scene, crying, the effect was electric. A young Pauline Kael, arriving late to the play, had to avert her eyes when Brando made this entrance as she believed the young actor on stage was having a real-life conniption. She did not look back until her escort commented that the young man was a great actor.\n\nThe problem with casting Brando as Stanley was that he was much younger than the character as written by Williams. However, after a meeting between Brando and Williams, the playwright eagerly agreed that Brando would make an ideal Stanley. Williams believed that by casting a younger actor, the Neanderthalish Kowalski would evolve from being a vicious older man to someone whose unintentional cruelty can be attributed to his youthful ignorance. Brando ultimately was dissatisfied with his performance, though, saying he never was able to bring out the humor of the character, which was ironic as his characterization often drew laughs from the audience at the expense of Jessica Tandy's Blanche Dubois. During the out-of-town tryouts, Kazan realized that Brando's magnetism was attracting attention and audience sympathy away from Blanche to Stanley, which was not what the playwright intended. The audience's sympathy should be solely with Blanche, but many spectators were identifying with Stanley. Kazan queried Williams on the matter, broaching the idea of a slight rewrite to tip the scales back to more of a balance between Stanley and Blanche, but Williams demurred, smitten as he was by Brando, just like the preview audiences.\n\nFor his part, Brando believed that the audience sided with his Stanley because Jessica Tandy was too shrill. He thought Vivien Leigh, who played the part in the movie, was ideal, as she was not only a great beauty but she WAS Blanche Dubois, troubled as she was in her real life by mental illness and nymphomania. Brando's appearance as Stanley on stage and on screen revolutionized American acting by introducing \"The Method\" into American consciousness and culture. Method acting, rooted in Adler's study at the Moscow Art Theatre of Stanislavsky's theories that she subsequently introduced to the Group Theatre, was a more naturalistic style of performing, as it engendered a close identification of the actor with the character's emotions. Adler took first place among Brando's acting teachers, and socially she helped turn him from an unsophisticated Midwestern farm boy into a knowledgeable and cosmopolitan artist who one day would socialize with presidents.\n\nBrando didn't like the term \"The Method,\" which quickly became the prominent paradigm taught by such acting gurus as Lee Strasberg at the Actors Studio. Brando denounced Strasberg in his autobiography \"Songs My Mother Taught Me\" (1994), saying that he was a talentless exploiter who claimed he had been Brando's mentor. The Actors Studio had been founded by Strasberg along with Kazan and Stella Adler's husband, Harold Clurman, all Group Theatre alumni, all political progressives deeply committed to the didactic function of the stage. Brando credits his knowledge of the craft to Adler and Kazan, while Kazan in his autobiography \"A Life\" claimed that Brando's genius thrived due to the thorough training Adler had given him. Adler's method emphasized that authenticity in acting is achieved by drawing on inner reality to expose deep emotional experience\n\nInterestingly, Elia Kazan believed that Brando had ruined two generations of actors, his contemporaries and those who came after him, all wanting to emulate the great Brando by employing The Method. Kazan felt that Brando was never a Method actor, that he had been highly trained by Adler and did not rely on gut instincts for his performances, as was commonly believed. Many a young actor, mistaken about the true roots of Brando's genius, thought that all it took was to find a character's motivation, empathize with the character through sense and memory association, and regurgitate it all on stage to become the character. That's not how the superbly trained Brando did it; he could, for example, play accents, whereas your average American Method actor could not. There was a method to Brando's art, Kazan felt, but it was not The Method.\n\nAfter A Streetcar Named Desire (1951), for which he received the first of his eight Academy Award nominations, Brando appeared in a string of Academy Award-nominated performances - in Viva Zapata! (1952), Julius Caesar (1953) and the summit of his early career, Kazan's On the Waterfront (1954). For his \"Waterfront\" portrayal of meat-headed longshoreman Terry Malloy, the washed-up pug who \"coulda been a contender,\" Brando won his first Oscar. Along with his iconic performance as the rebel-without-a-cause Johnny in The Wild One (1953) (\"What are you rebelling against?\" Johnny is asked. \"What have ya got?\" is his reply), the first wave of his career was, according to Jon Voight, unprecedented in its audacious presentation of such a wide range of great acting. Director John Huston said his performance of Marc Antony was like seeing the door of a furnace opened in a dark room, and co-star John Gielgud, the premier Shakespearean actor of the 20th century, invited Brando to join his repertory company.\n\nIt was this period of 1951-54 that revolutionized American acting, spawning such imitators as James Dean - who modeled his acting and even his lifestyle on his hero Brando - the young Paul Newman and Steve McQueen. After Brando, every up-and-coming star with true acting talent and a brooding, alienated quality would be hailed as the \"New Brando,\" such as Warren Beatty in Kazan's Splendor in the Grass (1961). \"We are all Brando's children,\" Jack Nicholson pointed out in 1972. \"He gave us our freedom.\" He was truly \"The Godfather\" of American acting - and he was just 30 years old. Though he had a couple of failures, like DƩsirƩe (1954) and The Teahouse of the August Moon (1956), he was clearly miscast in them and hadn't sought out the parts so largely escaped blame.\n\nIn the second period of his career, 1955-62, Brando managed to uniquely establish himself as a great actor who also was a Top 10 movie star, although that star began to dim after the box-office high point of his early career, Sayonara (1957) (for which he received his fifth Best Actor Oscar nomination). Brando tried his hand at directing a film, the well-reviewed One-Eyed Jacks (1961) that he made for his own production company, Pennebaker Productions (after his mother's maiden name). Stanley Kubrick had been hired to direct the film, but after months of script rewrites in which Brando participated, Kubrick and Brando had a falling out and Kubrick was sacked. According to his widow Christiane Kubrick, Stanley believed that Brando had wanted to direct the film himself all along.\n\nTales proliferated about the profligacy of Brando the director, burning up a million and a half feet of expensive VistaVision film at 50 cents a foot, fully ten times the normal amount of raw stock expended during production of an equivalent motion picture. Brando took so long editing the film that he was never able to present the studio with a cut. Paramount took it away from him and tacked on a re-shot ending that Brando was dissatisfied with, as it made the Oedipal figure of Dad Longworth into a villain. In any normal film Dad would have been the heavy, but Brando believed that no one was innately evil, that it was a matter of an individual responding to, and being molded by, one's environment. It was not a black-and-white world, Brando felt, but a gray world in which once-decent people could do horrible things. This attitude explains his sympathetic portrayal of Nazi officer Christian Diestl in the film he made before shooting One-Eyed Jacks (1961), Edward Dmytryk's filming of Irwin Shaw's novel The Young Lions (1958). Shaw denounced Brando's performance, but audiences obviously disagreed, as the film was a major hit. It would be the last hit movie Brando would have for more than a decade.\n\nOne-Eyed Jacks (1961) generated respectable numbers at the box office, but the production costs were exorbitant - a then-staggering $6 million - which made it run a deficit. A film essentially is \"made\" in the editing room, and Brando found cutting to be a terribly boring process, which was why the studio eventually took the film away from him. Despite his proved talent in handling actors and a large production, Brando never again directed another film, though he would claim that all actors essentially direct themselves during the shooting of a picture.\n\nBetween the production and release of One-Eyed Jacks (1961), Brando appeared in Sidney Lumet's film version of Tennessee Williams' play \"Orpheus Descending,\" The Fugitive Kind (1960) which teamed him with fellow Oscar winners Anna Magnani and Joanne Woodward. Following in Elizabeth Taylor's trailblazing footsteps, Brando became the second performer to receive a $1-million salary for a motion picture, so high were the expectations for this re-teaming of Kowalski and his creator (in 1961 critic Hollis Alpert had published a book \"Brando and the Shadow of Stanley Kowalski\"). Critics and audiences waiting for another incendiary display from Brando in a Williams work were disappointed when the renamed The Fugitive Kind (1960) finally released. Though Tennessee was hot, with movie versions of Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) and Suddenly, Last Summer (1959) burning up the box office and receiving kudos from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, The Fugitive Kind (1960) was a failure. This was followed by the so-so box-office reception of One-Eyed Jacks (1961) in 1961 and then by a failure of a more monumental kind: Mutiny on the Bounty (1962), a remake of the famed 1935 film.\n\nBrando signed on to Mutiny on the Bounty (1962) after turning down the lead in the David Lean classic Lawrence of Arabia (1962) because he didn't want to spend a year in the desert riding around on a camel. He received another $1-million salary, plus $200,000 in overages as the shoot went overtime and over budget. During principal photography, highly respected director Carol Reed (an eventual Academy Award winner) was fired, and his replacement, two-time Oscar winner Lewis Milestone, was shunted aside by Brando as Marlon basically took over the direction of the film himself. The long shoot became so notorious that President John F. Kennedy asked director Billy Wilder at a cocktail party not \"when\" but \"if\" the \"Bounty\" shoot would ever be over. The MGM remake of one of its classic Golden Age films garnered a Best Picture Oscar nomination and was one of the top grossing films of 1962, yet failed to go into the black due to its Brobdingnagian budget estimated at $20 million, which is equivalent to $120 million when adjusted for inflation.\n\nBrando and Taylor, whose Cleopatra (1963) nearly bankrupted 20th Century-Fox due to its huge cost overruns (its final budget was more than twice that of Brando's Mutiny on the Bounty (1962)), were pilloried by the show business press for being the epitome of the pampered, self-indulgent stars who were ruining the industry. Seeking scapegoats, the Hollywood press conveniently ignored the financial pressures on the studios. The studios had been hurt by television and by the antitrust-mandated divestiture of their movie theater chains, causing a large outflow of production to Italy and other countries in the 1950s and 1960s in order to lower costs. The studio bosses, seeking to replicate such blockbuster hits as the remakes of The Ten Commandments (1956) and Ben-Hur (1959), were the real culprits behind the losses generated by large-budgeted films that found it impossible to recoup their costs despite long lines at the box office.\n\nWhile Elizabeth Taylor, receiving the unwanted gift of reams of publicity from her adulterous romance with Cleopatra (1963) co-star Richard Burton, remained hot until the tanking of her own Tennessee Williams-renamed debacle Boom! (1968), Brando from 1963 until the end of the decade appeared in one box-office failure after another as he worked out a contract he had signed with Universal Pictures. The industry had grown tired of Brando and his idiosyncrasies, though he continued to be offered prestige projects up through 1968.\n\nSome of the films Brando made in the 1960s were noble failures, such as The Ugly American (1963), The Appaloosa (1966) and Reflections in a Golden Eye (1967). For every \"Reflections,\" though, there seemed to be two or three outright debacles, such as Bedtime Story (1964), Morituri (1965), The Chase (1966), A Countess from Hong Kong (1967), Candy (1968), The Night of the Following Day (1969). By the time Brando began making the anti-colonialist picture Burn! (1969) in Colombia with Gillo Pontecorvo in the director's chair, he was box-office poison, despite having worked in the previous five years with such top directors as Arthur Penn, John Huston and the legendary Charles Chaplin, and with such top-drawer co-stars as David Niven, Yul Brynner, Sophia Loren and Taylor.\n\nThe rap on Brando in the 1960s was that a great talent had ruined his potential to be America's answer to Laurence Olivier, as his friend William Redfield limned the dilemma in his book \"Letters from an Actor\" (1967), a memoir about Redfield's appearance in Burton's 1964 theatrical production of \"Hamlet.\" By failing to go back on stage and recharge his artistic batteries, something British actors such as Burton were not afraid to do, Brando had stifled his great talent, by refusing to tackle the classical repertoire and contemporary drama. Actors and critics had yearned for an American response to the high-acting style of the Brits, and while Method actors such as Rod Steiger tried to create an American style, they were hampered in their quest, as their king was lost in a wasteland of Hollywood movies that were beneath his talent. Many of his early supporters now turned on him, claiming he was a crass sellout.\n\nDespite evidence in such films as The Appaloosa (1966) and Reflections in a Golden Eye (1967) that Brando was in fact doing some of the best acting of his life, critics, perhaps with an eye on the box office, slammed him for failing to live up to, and nurture, his great gift. Brando's political activism, starting in the early 1960s with his championing of Native Americans' rights, followed by his participation in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference's March on Washington in 1963, and followed by his appearance at a Black Panther rally in 1968, did not win him many admirers in the establishment. In fact, there was a de facto embargo on Brando films in the recently segregated (officially, at least) southeastern US in the 1960s. Southern exhibitors simply would not book his films, and producers took notice. After 1968, Brando would not work for three years.\n\nPauline Kael wrote of Brando that he was Fortune's fool. She drew a parallel with the latter career of John Barrymore, a similarly gifted thespian with talents as prodigious, who seemingly threw them away. Brando, like the late-career Barrymore, had become a great ham, evidenced by his turn as the faux Indian guru in the egregious Candy (1968), seemingly because the material was so beneath his talent. Most observers of Brando in the 1960s believed that he needed to be reunited with his old mentor Elia Kazan, a relationship that had soured due to Kazan's friendly testimony naming names before the notorious House un-American Activities Committee. Perhaps Brando believed this, too, as he originally accepted an offer to appear as the star of Kazan's film adaptation of his own novel, The Arrangement (1969). However, after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Brando backed out of the film, telling Kazan that he could not appear in a Hollywood film after this tragedy. Also reportedly turning down a role opposite box-office king Paul Newman in a surefire script, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969), Brando decided to make Burn! (1969) with Pontecorvo. The film, a searing indictment of racism and colonialism, flopped at the box office but won the esteem of progressive critics and cultural arbiters such as Howard Zinn. He subsequently appeared in the British film The Nightcomers (1971), a prequel to \"Turn of the Screw\" and another critical and box office failure.\n\nKazan, after a life in film and the theater, said that, aside from Orson Welles, whose greatness lay in film making, he only met one actor who was a genius: Brando. Richard Burton, an intellectual with a keen eye for observation if not for his own film projects, said that he found Brando to be very bright, unlike the public perception of him as a Terry Malloy-type character that he himself inadvertently promoted through his boorish behavior. Brando's problem, Burton felt, was that he was unique, and that he had gotten too much fame too soon at too early an age. Cut off from being nurtured by normal contact with society, fame had distorted Brando's personality and his ability to cope with the world, as he had not had time to grow up outside the limelight.\n\nTruman Capote, who eviscerated Brando in print in the mid-'50s and had as much to do with the public perception of the dyslexic Brando as a dumbbell, always said that the best actors were ignorant, and that an intelligent person could not be a good actor. However, Brando was highly intelligent, and possessed of a rare genius in a then-deprecated art, acting. The problem that an intelligent performer has in movies is that it is the director, and not the actor, who has the power in his chosen field. Greatness in the other arts is defined by how much control the artist is able to exert over his chosen medium, but in movie acting, the medium is controlled by a person outside the individual artist. It is an axiom of the cinema that a performance, as is a film, is \"created\" in the cutting room, thus further removing the actor from control over his art. Brando had tried his hand at directing, in controlling the whole artistic enterprise, but he could not abide the cutting room, where a film and the film's performances are made. This lack of control over his art was the root of Brando's discontent with acting, with movies, and, eventually, with the whole wide world that invested so much cachet in movie actors, as long as \"they\" were at the top of the box-office charts. Hollywood was a matter of \"they\" and not the work, and Brando became disgusted.\n\nCharlton Heston, who participated in Martin Luther King's 1963 March on Washington with Brando, believes that Marlon was the great actor of his generation. However, noting a story that Brando had once refused a role in the early 1960s with the excuse \"How can I act when people are starving in India?,\" Heston believes that it was this attitude, the inability to separate one's idealism from one's work, that prevented Brando from reaching his potential. As Rod Steiger once said, Brando had it all, great stardom and a great talent. He could have taken his audience on a trip to the stars, but he simply would not. Steiger, one of Brando's children even though a contemporary, could not understand it. When James Mason' was asked in 1971 who was the best American actor, he had replied that since Brando had let his career go belly-up, it had to be George C. Scott, by default.\n\nParamount thought that only Laurence Olivier would suffice, but Lord Olivier was ill. The young director believed there was only one actor who could play godfather to the group of Young Turk actors he had assembled for his film, The Godfather of method acting himself - Marlon Brando. Francis Ford Coppola won the fight for Brando, Brando won - and refused - his second Oscar, and Paramount won a pot of gold by producing the then top-grossing film of all-time, The Godfather (1972), a gangster movie most critics now judge one of the greatest American films of all time. Brando followed his iconic portrayal of Don Corleone with his Oscar-nominated turn in the high-grossing and highly scandalous Last Tango in Paris (1972) (\"Last Tango in Paris\"), the first film dealing explicitly with sexuality in which an actor of Brando's stature had participated. He was now again a top ten box office star and once again heralded as the greatest actor of his generation, an unprecedented comeback that put him on the cover of \"Time\" magazine and would make him the highest-paid actor in the history of motion pictures by the end of the decade. Little did the world know that Brando, who had struggled through many projects in good faith during the 1960s, delivering some of his best acting, only to be excoriated and ignored as the films did not do well at the box office, essentially was through with the movies.\n\nAfter reaching the summit of his career, a rarefied atmosphere never reached before or since by any actor, Brando essentially walked away. He would give no more of himself after giving everything as he had done in Last Tango in Paris (1972),\" a performance that embarrassed him, according to his autobiography. Brando had come as close to any actor to being the \"auteur,\" or author, of a film, as the English-language scenes of \"Tango\" were created by encouraging Brando to improvise. The improvisations were written down and turned into a shooting script, and the scripted improvisations were shot the next day. Pauline Kael, the Brando of movie critics in that she was the most influential arbiter of cinematic quality of her generation and spawned a whole legion of Kael wannabes, said Brando's performance in Last Tango in Paris (1972) had revolutionized the art of film. Brando, who had to act to gain his mother's attention; Brando, who believed acting at best was nothing special as everyone in the world engaged in it every day of their lives to get what they wanted from other people; Brando, who believed acting at its worst was a childish charade and that movie stardom was a whorish fraud, would have agreed with Sam Peckinpah's summation of Pauline Kael: \"Pauline's a brilliant critic but sometimes she's just cracking walnuts with her ass.\" He probably would have done so in a simulacrum of those words, too.\n\nAfter another three-year hiatus, Brando took on just one more major role for the next 20 years, as the bounty hunter after Jack Nicholson in Arthur Penn's The Missouri Breaks (1976), a western that succeeded neither with the critics or at the box office. Following The Godfather and Tango, Brando's performance was disappointing for some reviewers, who accused him of giving an erratic and inconsistent performance. In 1977, Brando made a rare appearance on television in the miniseries Roots: The Next Generations (1979), portraying George Lincoln Rockwell; he won a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Miniseries or a Movie for his performance. In 1978, he narrated the English version of Raoni (1978), a French-Belgian documentary film directed by Jean-Pierre Dutilleux and Luiz Carlos Saldanha that focused on the life of Raoni Metuktire and issues surrounding the survival of the indigenous Indian tribes of north central Brazil.\n\nLater in his career, Brando concentrated on extracting the maximum amount of capital for the least amount of work from producers, as when he got the Salkind brothers to pony up a then-record $3.7 million against 10% of the gross for 13 days work on Superman (1978). Factoring in inflation, the straight salary for \"Superman\" equals or exceeds the new record of $1 million a day Harrison Ford set with K-19: The Widowmaker (2002). He agreed to the role only on assurance that he would be paid a large sum for what amounted to a small part, that he would not have to read the script beforehand, and his lines would be displayed somewhere off-camera. Brando also filmed scenes for the movie's sequel, Superman II, but after producers refused to pay him the same percentage he received for the first movie, he denied them permission to use the footage.\n\nBefore cashing his first paycheck for Superman (1978), Brando had picked up $2 million for his extended cameo in Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now (1979) in a role, that of Col. Kurtz, that he authored on-camera through improvisation while Coppola shot take after take. It was Brando's last bravura star performance. He co-starred with George C. Scott and John Gielgud in The Formula (1980), but the film was another critical and financial failure. Years later though, he did receive an eighth and final Oscar nomination for his supporting role in A Dry White Season (1989) after coming out of a near-decade-long retirement. Contrary to those who claimed he now only was in it for the money, Brando donated his entire seven-figure salary to an anti-apartheid charity. He then did an amusing performance in the comedy The Freshman (1990), winning rave reviews. He portrayed Tomas de Torquemada in the historical drama 1492: Conquest of Paradise (1992), but his performance was denounced and the film was another box office failure. He made another comeback in the Johnny Depp romantic drama Don Juan DeMarco (1994), which co-starred Faye Dunaway as his wife. He then appeared in The Island of Dr. Moreau (1996), co-starring Val Kilmer, who he didn't get along with. The filming was an unpleasant experience for Brando, as well as another critical and box office failure.\n\nBrando had first attracted media attention at the age of 24, when \"Life\" magazine ran a photo of himself and his sister Jocelyn, who were both then appearing on Broadway. The curiosity continued, and snowballed. Playing the paraplegic soldier of The Men (1950), Brando had gone to live at a Veterans Administration hospital with actual disabled veterans, and confined himself to a wheelchair for weeks. It was an acting method, research, that no one in Hollywood had ever heard of before, and that willingness to experience life."
    },
    "bioHtml": "Marlon Brando is widely considered the greatest movie actor of all\ntime, rivaled only by the more theatrically oriented\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000059/\">Laurence Olivier</a> in terms of esteem.\nUnlike Olivier, who preferred the stage to the screen, Brando\nconcentrated his talents on movies after bidding the Broadway stage\nadieu in 1949, a decision for which he was severely criticized when his\nstar began to dim in the 1960s and he was excoriated for squandering\nhis talents. No actor ever exerted such a profound influence on\nsucceeding generations of actors as did Brando. More than 50 years\nafter he first scorched the screen as Stanley Kowalski in the movie\nversion of <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0931783/\">Tennessee Williams</a>&#39;\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0044081/\">A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)</a>\nand a quarter-century after his last great performance as Col. Kurtz in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000338/\">Francis Ford Coppola</a>&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0078788/\">Apocalypse Now (1979)</a>, all\nAmerican actors are still being measured by the yardstick that was\nBrando. It was if the shadow of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000858/\">John Barrymore</a>, the great\nAmerican actor closest to Brando in terms of talent and stardom,\ndominated the acting field up until the 1970s. He did not, nor did any\nother actor so dominate the public&#39;s consciousness of what WAS an actor\nbefore or since Brando&#39;s 1951 on-screen portrayal of Stanley made him a\ncultural icon. Brando eclipsed the reputation of other great actors\ncirca 1950, such as <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0612847/\">Paul Muni</a> and\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0545298/\">Fredric March</a>. Only the luster of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000075/\">Spencer Tracy</a>&#39;s reputation hasn&#39;t\ndimmed when seen in the starlight thrown off by Brando. However,\nneither Tracy nor Olivier created an entire school of acting just by\nthe force of his personality. Brando did.<br/><br/>Marlon Brando, Jr. was born on April 3, 1924, in Omaha, Nebraska, to\nMarlon Brando, Sr., a calcium carbonate salesman, and his artistically\ninclined wife, the former Dorothy Julia Pennebaker. &quot;Bud&quot; Brando was\none of three children. His ancestry included English, Irish, German, Dutch, French Huguenot, Welsh, and Scottish;\nhis surname originated with a distant German immigrant ancestor named\n&quot;Brandau.&quot; His oldest sister\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0104720/\">Jocelyn Brando</a> was also an actress,\ntaking after their mother, who engaged in amateur theatricals and\nmentored a then-unknown <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000020/\">Henry Fonda</a>, another\nNebraska native, in her role as director of the Omaha Community\nPlayhouse. Frannie, Brando&#39;s other sibling, was a visual artist. Both\nBrando sisters contrived to leave the Midwest for New York City,\nJocelyn to study acting and Frannie to study art. Marlon managed to\nescape the vocational doldrums forecast for him by his cold, distant\nfather and his disapproving schoolteachers by striking out for The Big\nApple in 1943, following Jocelyn into the acting profession. Acting was\nthe only thing he was good at, for which he received praise, so he was\ndetermined to make it his career - a high-school dropout, he had\nnothing else to fall back on, having been rejected by the military due\nto a knee injury he incurred playing football at Shattuck Military\nAcademy, Brando Sr.&#39;s alma mater. The school booted Marlon out as\nincorrigible before graduation.<br/><br/>Acting was a skill he honed as a child, the lonely son of alcoholic\nparents. With his father away on the road, and his mother frequently\nintoxicated to the point of stupefaction, the young Bud would play-act\nfor her to draw her out of her stupor and to attract her attention and\nlove. His mother was exceedingly neglectful, but he loved her,\nparticularly for instilling in him a love of nature, a feeling which\ninformed his character Paul in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0070849/\">Last Tango in Paris (1972)</a>\n(&quot;Last Tango in Paris&quot;) when he is recalling his childhood for his\nyoung lover Jeanne. &quot;I don&#39;t have many good memories,&quot; Paul confesses,\nand neither did Brando of his childhood. Sometimes he had to go down to\nthe town jail to pick up his mother after she had spent the night in\nthe drunk tank and bring her home, events that traumatized the young\nboy but may have been the grain that irritated the oyster of his\ntalent, producing the pearls of his performances.\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000063/\">Anthony Quinn</a>, his Oscar-winning\nco-star in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0045296/\">Viva Zapata! (1952)</a> told\nBrando&#39;s first wife <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0440542/\">Anna Kashfi</a>, &quot;I admire\nMarlon&#39;s talent, but I don&#39;t envy the pain that created it.&quot;<br/><br/>Brando enrolled in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0685442/\">Erwin Piscator</a>&#39;s\nDramatic Workshop at New York&#39;s New School, and was mentored by\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0012245/\">Stella Adler</a>, a member of a famous Yiddish\nTheatre acting family. Adler helped introduce to the New York stage the\n&quot;emotional memory&quot; technique of Russian theatrical actor, director and\nimpresario\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm2507427/\">Konstantin Stanislavski</a>, whose\nmotto was &quot;Think of your own experiences and use them truthfully.&quot; The\nresults of this meeting between an actor and the teacher preparing him\nfor a life in the theater would mark a watershed in American acting and\nculture.<br/><br/>Brando made his debut on the boards of Broadway on October 19, 1944, in\n&quot;I Remember Mama,&quot; a great success. As a young Broadway actor, Brando\nwas invited by talent scouts from several different studios to\nscreen-test for them, but he turned them down because he would not let\nhimself be bound by the then-standard seven-year contract. Brando would\nmake his film debut quite some time later in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0003593/\">Fred Zinnemann</a>&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0042727/\">The Men (1950)</a> for producer\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0006452/\">Stanley Kramer</a>. Playing a paraplegic\nsoldier, Brando brought new levels of realism to the screen, expanding\non the verisimilitude brought to movies by Group Theatre alumni\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0002092/\">John Garfield</a>, the predecessor\nclosest to him in the raw power he projected on-screen. Ironically, it\nwas Garfield whom producer\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm1245243/\">Irene Mayer Selznick</a> had chosen to\nplay the lead in a new\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0931783/\">Tennessee Williams</a> play she was about\nto produce, but negotiations broke down when Garfield demanded an\nownership stake in &quot;A Streetcar Named Desire.&quot;\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000044/\">Burt Lancaster</a> was next approached, but\ncouldn&#39;t get out of a prior film commitment. Then director\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001415/\">Elia Kazan</a> suggested Brando, whom he had\ndirected to great effect in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0027173/\">Maxwell Anderson</a>&#39;s play\n&quot;Truckline CafƩ,&quot; in which Brando co-starred with\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001500/\">Karl Malden</a>, who was to remain a close\nfriend for the next 60 years.<br/><br/>During the production of &quot;Truckline CafƩ,&quot; Kazan had found that\nBrando&#39;s presence was so magnetic, he had to re-block the play to keep\nMarlon near other major characters&#39; stage business, as the audience\ncould not take its eyes off of him. For the scene where Brando&#39;s\ncharacter re-enters the stage after killing his wife, Kazan placed him\nupstage-center, partially obscured by scenery, but where the audience\ncould still see him as <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001500/\">Karl Malden</a> and\nothers played out their scene within the cafƩ set. When he eventually\nentered the scene, crying, the effect was electric. A young\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0434461/\">Pauline Kael</a>, arriving late to the play,\nhad to avert her eyes when Brando made this entrance as she believed\nthe young actor on stage was having a real-life conniption. She did not\nlook back until her escort commented that the young man was a great\nactor.<br/><br/>The problem with casting Brando as Stanley was that he was much younger\nthan the character as written by Williams. However, after a meeting\nbetween Brando and Williams, the playwright eagerly agreed that Brando\nwould make an ideal Stanley. Williams believed that by casting a\nyounger actor, the Neanderthalish Kowalski would evolve from being a\nvicious older man to someone whose unintentional cruelty can be\nattributed to his youthful ignorance. Brando ultimately was\ndissatisfied with his performance, though, saying he never was able to\nbring out the humor of the character, which was ironic as his\ncharacterization often drew laughs from the audience at the expense of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001788/\">Jessica Tandy</a>&#39;s Blanche Dubois. During the\nout-of-town tryouts, Kazan realized that Brando&#39;s magnetism was\nattracting attention and audience sympathy away from Blanche to\nStanley, which was not what the playwright intended. The audience&#39;s\nsympathy should be solely with Blanche, but many spectators were\nidentifying with Stanley. Kazan queried Williams on the matter,\nbroaching the idea of a slight rewrite to tip the scales back to more\nof a balance between Stanley and Blanche, but Williams demurred,\nsmitten as he was by Brando, just like the preview audiences.<br/><br/>For his part, Brando believed that the audience sided with his Stanley\nbecause <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001788/\">Jessica Tandy</a> was too shrill. He\nthought <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000046/\">Vivien Leigh</a>, who played the part\nin the movie, was ideal, as she was not only a great beauty but she WAS\nBlanche Dubois, troubled as she was in her real life by mental illness\nand nymphomania. Brando&#39;s appearance as Stanley on stage and on screen\nrevolutionized American acting by introducing &quot;The Method&quot; into\nAmerican consciousness and culture. Method acting, rooted in Adler&#39;s\nstudy at the Moscow Art Theatre of Stanislavsky&#39;s theories that she\nsubsequently introduced to the Group Theatre, was a more naturalistic\nstyle of performing, as it engendered a close identification of the\nactor with the character&#39;s emotions. Adler took first place among\nBrando&#39;s acting teachers, and socially she helped turn him from an\nunsophisticated Midwestern farm boy into a knowledgeable and\ncosmopolitan artist who one day would socialize with presidents.<br/><br/>Brando didn&#39;t like the term &quot;The Method,&quot; which quickly became the\nprominent paradigm taught by such acting gurus as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0833448/\">Lee Strasberg</a> at the Actors Studio. Brando\ndenounced Strasberg in his autobiography &quot;Songs My Mother Taught Me&quot;\n(1994), saying that he was a talentless exploiter who claimed he had\nbeen Brando&#39;s mentor. The Actors Studio had been founded by Strasberg\nalong with Kazan and <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0012245/\">Stella Adler</a>&#39;s\nhusband, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0167353/\">Harold Clurman</a>, all Group\nTheatre alumni, all political progressives deeply committed to the\ndidactic function of the stage. Brando credits his knowledge of the\ncraft to Adler and Kazan, while Kazan in his autobiography &quot;A Life&quot;\nclaimed that Brando&#39;s genius thrived due to the thorough training Adler\nhad given him. Adler&#39;s method emphasized that authenticity in acting is\nachieved by drawing on inner reality to expose deep emotional\nexperience<br/><br/>Interestingly, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001415/\">Elia Kazan</a> believed that\nBrando had ruined two generations of actors, his contemporaries and\nthose who came after him, all wanting to emulate the great Brando by\nemploying The Method. Kazan felt that Brando was never a Method actor,\nthat he had been highly trained by Adler and did not rely on gut\ninstincts for his performances, as was commonly believed. Many a young\nactor, mistaken about the true roots of Brando&#39;s genius, thought that\nall it took was to find a character&#39;s motivation, empathize with the\ncharacter through sense and memory association, and regurgitate it all\non stage to become the character. That&#39;s not how the superbly trained\nBrando did it; he could, for example, play accents, whereas your\naverage American Method actor could not. There was a method to Brando&#39;s\nart, Kazan felt, but it was not The Method.<br/><br/>After\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0044081/\">A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)</a>,\nfor which he received the first of his eight Academy Award nominations,\nBrando appeared in a string of Academy Award-nominated performances -\nin <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0045296/\">Viva Zapata! (1952)</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0045943/\">Julius Caesar (1953)</a> and the summit\nof his early career, Kazan&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0047296/\">On the Waterfront (1954)</a>. For\nhis &quot;Waterfront&quot; portrayal of meat-headed longshoreman Terry Malloy,\nthe washed-up pug who &quot;coulda been a contender,&quot; Brando won his first\nOscar. Along with his iconic performance as the rebel-without-a-cause\nJohnny in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0047677/\">The Wild One (1953)</a> (&quot;What\nare you rebelling against?&quot; Johnny is asked. &quot;What have ya got?&quot; is his\nreply), the first wave of his career was, according to\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000685/\">Jon Voight</a>, unprecedented in its audacious\npresentation of such a wide range of great acting. Director\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001379/\">John Huston</a> said his performance of\nMarc Antony was like seeing the door of a furnace opened in a dark\nroom, and co-star <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000024/\">John Gielgud</a>, the premier\nShakespearean actor of the 20th century, invited Brando to join his\nrepertory company.<br/><br/>It was this period of 1951-54 that revolutionized American acting,\nspawning such imitators as <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000015/\">James Dean</a> - who modeled his acting and even his lifestyle on his hero Brando - the young <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000056/\">Paul Newman</a> and\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000537/\">Steve McQueen</a>. After Brando, every up-and-coming star with true acting talent and a brooding, alienated quality would be hailed as the &quot;New Brando,&quot; such as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000886/\">Warren Beatty</a> in Kazan&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0055471/\">Splendor in the Grass (1961)</a>.\n&quot;We are all Brando&#39;s children,&quot;\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000197/\">Jack Nicholson</a> pointed out in\n1972. &quot;He gave us our freedom.&quot; He was truly &quot;The Godfather&quot; of\nAmerican acting - and he was just 30 years old. Though he had a couple of failures, like <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0046903/\">DƩsirƩe (1954)</a> and <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0049830/\">The Teahouse of the August Moon (1956)</a>, he was clearly miscast in them and hadn&#39;t sought out the parts so largely escaped blame.<br/><br/>In the second period of his career, 1955-62, Brando managed to uniquely\nestablish himself as a great actor who also was a Top 10 movie star,\nalthough that star began to dim after the box-office high point of his\nearly career, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0050933/\">Sayonara (1957)</a> (for which\nhe received his fifth Best Actor Oscar nomination). Brando tried his\nhand at directing a film, the well-reviewed\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0055257/\">One-Eyed Jacks (1961)</a> that he made\nfor his own production company, Pennebaker Productions (after his\nmother&#39;s maiden name). <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000040/\">Stanley Kubrick</a>\nhad been hired to direct the film, but after months of script rewrites\nin which Brando participated, Kubrick and Brando had a falling out and\nKubrick was sacked. According to his widow\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0473583/\">Christiane Kubrick</a>, Stanley believed\nthat Brando had wanted to direct the film himself all along.<br/><br/>Tales proliferated about the profligacy of Brando the director, burning\nup a million and a half feet of expensive VistaVision film at 50 cents\na foot, fully ten times the normal amount of raw stock expended during\nproduction of an equivalent motion picture. Brando took so long editing\nthe film that he was never able to present the studio with a cut.\nParamount took it away from him and tacked on a re-shot ending that\nBrando was dissatisfied with, as it made the Oedipal figure of Dad\nLongworth into a villain. In any normal film Dad would have been the\nheavy, but Brando believed that no one was innately evil, that it was a\nmatter of an individual responding to, and being molded by, one&#39;s\nenvironment. It was not a black-and-white world, Brando felt, but a\ngray world in which once-decent people could do horrible things. This\nattitude explains his sympathetic portrayal of Nazi officer Christian\nDiestl in the film he made before shooting\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0055257/\">One-Eyed Jacks (1961)</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0229424/\">Edward Dmytryk</a>&#39;s filming of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0789758/\">Irwin Shaw</a>&#39;s novel\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0052415/\">The Young Lions (1958)</a>. Shaw\ndenounced Brando&#39;s performance, but audiences obviously disagreed, as\nthe film was a major hit. It would be the last hit movie Brando would\nhave for more than a decade.<br/><br/><a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0055257/\">One-Eyed Jacks (1961)</a> generated\nrespectable numbers at the box office, but the production costs were\nexorbitant - a then-staggering $6 million - which made it run a\ndeficit. A film essentially is &quot;made&quot; in the editing room, and Brando\nfound cutting to be a terribly boring process, which was why the studio\neventually took the film away from him. Despite his proved talent in\nhandling actors and a large production, Brando never again directed\nanother film, though he would claim that all actors essentially direct\nthemselves during the shooting of a picture.<br/><br/>Between the production and release of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0055257/\">One-Eyed Jacks (1961)</a>, Brando\nappeared in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001486/\">Sidney Lumet</a>&#39;s film version of\nTennessee Williams&#39; play &quot;Orpheus Descending,&quot;\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0052832/\">The Fugitive Kind (1960)</a> which\nteamed him with fellow Oscar winners\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0536167/\">Anna Magnani</a> and\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0940946/\">Joanne Woodward</a>. Following in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000072/\">Elizabeth Taylor</a>&#39;s trailblazing\nfootsteps, Brando became the second performer to receive a $1-million\nsalary for a motion picture, so high were the expectations for this\nre-teaming of Kowalski and his creator (in 1961 critic\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm1094899/\">Hollis Alpert</a> had published a book &quot;Brando\nand the Shadow of Stanley Kowalski&quot;). Critics and audiences waiting for\nanother incendiary display from Brando in a Williams work were\ndisappointed when the renamed\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0052832/\">The Fugitive Kind (1960)</a>\nfinally released. Though Tennessee was hot, with movie versions of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0051459/\">Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)</a>\nand\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0053318/\">Suddenly, Last Summer (1959)</a>\nburning up the box office and receiving kudos from the Academy of\nMotion Picture Arts &amp; Sciences,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0052832/\">The Fugitive Kind (1960)</a> was a\nfailure. This was followed by the so-so box-office reception of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0055257/\">One-Eyed Jacks (1961)</a> in 1961 and\nthen by a failure of a more monumental kind:\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056264/\">Mutiny on the Bounty (1962)</a>,\na remake of the famed 1935 film.<br/><br/>Brando signed on to\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056264/\">Mutiny on the Bounty (1962)</a>\nafter turning down the lead in the\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000180/\">David Lean</a> classic\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056172/\">Lawrence of Arabia (1962)</a>\nbecause he didn&#39;t want to spend a year in the desert riding around on a\ncamel. He received another $1-million salary, plus $200,000 in overages\nas the shoot went overtime and over budget. During principal\nphotography, highly respected director\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0715346/\">Carol Reed</a> (an eventual Academy Award\nwinner) was fired, and his replacement, two-time Oscar winner\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0587277/\">Lewis Milestone</a>, was shunted aside by\nBrando as Marlon basically took over the direction of the film himself.\nThe long shoot became so notorious that President\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0448123/\">John F. Kennedy</a> asked director\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000697/\">Billy Wilder</a> at a cocktail party not &quot;when&quot;\nbut &quot;if&quot; the &quot;Bounty&quot; shoot would ever be over. The MGM remake of one\nof its classic Golden Age films garnered a Best Picture Oscar\nnomination and was one of the top grossing films of 1962, yet failed to\ngo into the black due to its Brobdingnagian budget estimated at $20\nmillion, which is equivalent to $120 million when adjusted for\ninflation.<br/><br/>Brando and Taylor, whose\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056937/\">Cleopatra (1963)</a> nearly bankrupted 20th\nCentury-Fox due to its huge cost overruns (its final budget was more\nthan twice that of Brando&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056264/\">Mutiny on the Bounty (1962)</a>),\nwere pilloried by the show business press for being the epitome of the\npampered, self-indulgent stars who were ruining the industry. Seeking\nscapegoats, the Hollywood press conveniently ignored the financial\npressures on the studios. The studios had been hurt by television and\nby the antitrust-mandated divestiture of their movie theater chains,\ncausing a large outflow of production to Italy and other countries in\nthe 1950s and 1960s in order to lower costs. The studio bosses, seeking\nto replicate such blockbuster hits as the remakes of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0049833/\">The Ten Commandments (1956)</a>\nand <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0052618/\">Ben-Hur (1959)</a>, were the real\nculprits behind the losses generated by large-budgeted films that found\nit impossible to recoup their costs despite long lines at the box\noffice.<br/><br/>While Elizabeth Taylor, receiving the unwanted gift of reams of\npublicity from her adulterous romance with\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056937/\">Cleopatra (1963)</a> co-star\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000009/\">Richard Burton</a>, remained hot\nuntil the tanking of her own Tennessee Williams-renamed debacle\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0062751/\">Boom! (1968)</a>, Brando from 1963 until the end\nof the decade appeared in one box-office failure after another as he\nworked out a contract he had signed with Universal Pictures. The\nindustry had grown tired of Brando and his idiosyncrasies, though he\ncontinued to be offered prestige projects up through 1968.<br/><br/>Some of the films Brando made in the 1960s were noble failures, such as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0056632/\">The Ugly American (1963)</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0060120/\">The Appaloosa (1966)</a> and\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0062185/\">Reflections in a Golden Eye (1967)</a>.\nFor every &quot;Reflections,&quot; though, there seemed to be two or three\noutright debacles, such as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0057878/\">Bedtime Story (1964)</a>, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0059470/\">Morituri (1965)</a>, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0060232/\">The Chase (1966)</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0061523/\">A Countess from Hong Kong (1967)</a>, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0062776/\">Candy (1968)</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0064728/\">The Night of the Following Day (1969)</a>.\nBy the time Brando began making the anti-colonialist picture\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0064866/\">Burn! (1969)</a> in Colombia with\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0690597/\">Gillo Pontecorvo</a> in the director&#39;s\nchair, he was box-office poison, despite having worked in the previous\nfive years with such top directors as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0671957/\">Arthur Penn</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001379/\">John Huston</a> and the legendary\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000122/\">Charles Chaplin</a>, and with such\ntop-drawer co-stars as <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000057/\">David Niven</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000989/\">Yul Brynner</a>,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000047/\">Sophia Loren</a> and Taylor.<br/><br/>The rap on Brando in the 1960s was that a great talent had ruined his\npotential to be America&#39;s answer to\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000059/\">Laurence Olivier</a>, as his friend\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0714835/\">William Redfield</a> limned the dilemma in\nhis book &quot;Letters from an Actor&quot; (1967), a memoir about Redfield&#39;s\nappearance in Burton&#39;s 1964 theatrical production of &quot;Hamlet.&quot; By\nfailing to go back on stage and recharge his artistic batteries,\nsomething British actors such as Burton were not afraid to do, Brando\nhad stifled his great talent, by refusing to tackle the classical\nrepertoire and contemporary drama. Actors and critics had yearned for\nan American response to the high-acting style of the Brits, and while\nMethod actors such as <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001768/\">Rod Steiger</a> tried to\ncreate an American style, they were hampered in their quest, as their\nking was lost in a wasteland of Hollywood movies that were beneath his\ntalent. Many of his early supporters now turned on him, claiming he was\na crass sellout.<br/><br/>Despite evidence in such films as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0060120/\">The Appaloosa (1966)</a> and\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0062185/\">Reflections in a Golden Eye (1967)</a>\nthat Brando was in fact doing some of the best acting of his life,\ncritics, perhaps with an eye on the box office, slammed him for failing\nto live up to, and nurture, his great gift. Brando&#39;s political\nactivism, starting in the early 1960s with his championing of Native\nAmericans&#39; rights, followed by his participation in the Southern\nChristian Leadership Conference&#39;s March on Washington in 1963, and\nfollowed by his appearance at a Black Panther rally in 1968, did not\nwin him many admirers in the establishment. In fact, there was a de\nfacto embargo on Brando films in the recently segregated (officially,\nat least) southeastern US in the 1960s. Southern exhibitors simply\nwould not book his films, and producers took notice. After 1968, Brando\nwould not work for three years.<br/><br/><a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0434461/\">Pauline Kael</a> wrote of Brando that he was\nFortune&#39;s fool. She drew a parallel with the latter career of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000858/\">John Barrymore</a>, a similarly\ngifted thespian with talents as prodigious, who seemingly threw them\naway. Brando, like the late-career Barrymore, had become a great ham,\nevidenced by his turn as the faux Indian guru in the egregious\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0062776/\">Candy (1968)</a>, seemingly because the\nmaterial was so beneath his talent. Most observers of Brando in the\n1960s believed that he needed to be reunited with his old mentor\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001415/\">Elia Kazan</a>, a relationship that had soured\ndue to Kazan&#39;s friendly testimony naming names before the notorious\nHouse un-American Activities Committee. Perhaps Brando believed this,\ntoo, as he originally accepted an offer to appear as the star of\nKazan&#39;s film adaptation of his own novel,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0064041/\">The Arrangement (1969)</a>. However,\nafter the assassination of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0455052/\">Martin Luther King</a>, Brando backed out\nof the film, telling Kazan that he could not appear in a Hollywood film\nafter this tragedy. Also reportedly turning down a role opposite\nbox-office king <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000056/\">Paul Newman</a> in a\nsurefire script,\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0064115/\">Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969)</a>,\nBrando decided to make <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0064866/\">Burn! (1969)</a>\nwith Pontecorvo. The film, a searing indictment of racism and\ncolonialism, flopped at the box office but won the esteem of\nprogressive critics and cultural arbiters such as\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0957016/\">Howard Zinn</a>. He subsequently appeared in the British film <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0069007/\">The Nightcomers (1971)</a>, a prequel to &quot;Turn of the Screw&quot; and another critical and box office failure.<br/><br/>Kazan, after a life in film and the theater, said that, aside from\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000080/\">Orson Welles</a>, whose greatness lay in\nfilm making, he only met one actor who was a genius: Brando. Richard\nBurton, an intellectual with a keen eye for observation if not for his\nown film projects, said that he found Brando to be very bright, unlike\nthe public perception of him as a Terry Malloy-type character that he\nhimself inadvertently promoted through his boorish behavior. Brando&#39;s\nproblem, Burton felt, was that he was unique, and that he had gotten\ntoo much fame too soon at too early an age. Cut off from being nurtured\nby normal contact with society, fame had distorted Brando&#39;s personality\nand his ability to cope with the world, as he had not had time to grow\nup outside the limelight.<br/><br/><a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001986/\">Truman Capote</a>, who eviscerated Brando in\nprint in the mid-&#39;50s and had as much to do with the public perception\nof the dyslexic Brando as a dumbbell, always said that the best actors\nwere ignorant, and that an intelligent person could not be a good\nactor. However, Brando was highly intelligent, and possessed of a rare\ngenius in a then-deprecated art, acting. The problem that an\nintelligent performer has in movies is that it is the director, and not\nthe actor, who has the power in his chosen field. Greatness in the\nother arts is defined by how much control the artist is able to exert\nover his chosen medium, but in movie acting, the medium is controlled\nby a person outside the individual artist. It is an axiom of the cinema\nthat a performance, as is a film, is &quot;created&quot; in the cutting room,\nthus further removing the actor from control over his art. Brando had\ntried his hand at directing, in controlling the whole artistic\nenterprise, but he could not abide the cutting room, where a film and\nthe film&#39;s performances are made. This lack of control over his art was\nthe root of Brando&#39;s discontent with acting, with movies, and,\neventually, with the whole wide world that invested so much cachet in\nmovie actors, as long as &quot;they&quot; were at the top of the box-office\ncharts. Hollywood was a matter of &quot;they&quot; and not the work, and Brando\nbecame disgusted.<br/><br/><a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000032/\">Charlton Heston</a>, who participated in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0455052/\">Martin Luther King</a>&#39;s 1963 March on\nWashington with Brando, believes that Marlon was the great actor of his\ngeneration. However, noting a story that Brando had once refused a role\nin the early 1960s with the excuse &quot;How can I act when people are\nstarving in India?,&quot; Heston believes that it was this attitude, the\ninability to separate one&#39;s idealism from one&#39;s work, that prevented\nBrando from reaching his potential. As\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001768/\">Rod Steiger</a> once said, Brando had it all,\ngreat stardom and a great talent. He could have taken his audience on a\ntrip to the stars, but he simply would not. Steiger, one of Brando&#39;s\nchildren even though a contemporary, could not understand it. When\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000051/\">James Mason</a>&#39; was asked in 1971 who\nwas the best American actor, he had replied that since Brando had let\nhis career go belly-up, it had to be\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001715/\">George C. Scott</a>, by default.<br/><br/>Paramount thought that only\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000059/\">Laurence Olivier</a> would suffice, but\nLord Olivier was ill. The young director believed there was only one\nactor who could play godfather to the group of Young Turk actors he had\nassembled for his film, The Godfather of method acting himself - Marlon\nBrando. <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000338/\">Francis Ford Coppola</a> won\nthe fight for Brando, Brando won - and refused - his second Oscar, and\nParamount won a pot of gold by producing the then top-grossing film of\nall-time, <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0068646/\">The Godfather (1972)</a>, a\ngangster movie most critics now judge one of the greatest American\nfilms of all time. Brando followed his iconic portrayal of Don Corleone\nwith his Oscar-nominated turn in the high-grossing and highly\nscandalous\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0070849/\">Last Tango in Paris (1972)</a>\n(&quot;Last Tango in Paris&quot;), the first film dealing explicitly with\nsexuality in which an actor of Brando&#39;s stature had participated. He\nwas now again a top ten box office star and once again heralded as the\ngreatest actor of his generation, an unprecedented comeback that put\nhim on the cover of &quot;Time&quot; magazine and would make him the highest-paid\nactor in the history of motion pictures by the end of the decade.\nLittle did the world know that Brando, who had struggled through many\nprojects in good faith during the 1960s, delivering some of his best\nacting, only to be excoriated and ignored as the films did not do well\nat the box office, essentially was through with the movies.<br/><br/>After reaching the summit of his career, a rarefied atmosphere never\nreached before or since by any actor, Brando essentially walked away.\nHe would give no more of himself after giving everything as he had done\nin <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0070849/\">Last Tango in Paris (1972)</a>,&quot; a performance that embarrassed him, according\nto his autobiography. Brando had come as close to any actor to being\nthe &quot;auteur,&quot; or author, of a film, as the English-language scenes of\n&quot;Tango&quot; were created by encouraging Brando to improvise. The\nimprovisations were written down and turned into a shooting script, and\nthe scripted improvisations were shot the next day.\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0434461/\">Pauline Kael</a>, the Brando of movie critics\nin that she was the most influential arbiter of cinematic quality of\nher generation and spawned a whole legion of Kael wannabes, said\nBrando&#39;s performance in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0070849/\">Last Tango in Paris (1972)</a> had revolutionized the art of\nfilm. Brando, who had to act to gain his mother&#39;s attention; Brando,\nwho believed acting at best was nothing special as everyone in the\nworld engaged in it every day of their lives to get what they wanted\nfrom other people; Brando, who believed acting at its worst was a\nchildish charade and that movie stardom was a whorish fraud, would have\nagreed with <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001603/\">Sam Peckinpah</a>&#39;s summation of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0434461/\">Pauline Kael</a>: &quot;Pauline&#39;s a brilliant critic\nbut sometimes she&#39;s just cracking walnuts with her ass.&quot; He probably would have done so in a\nsimulacrum of those words, too.<br/><br/>After another three-year hiatus, Brando took on just one more major\nrole for the next 20 years, as the bounty hunter after\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000197/\">Jack Nicholson</a> in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0671957/\">Arthur Penn</a>&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0074906/\">The Missouri Breaks (1976)</a>, a\nwestern that succeeded neither with the critics or at the box office. Following The Godfather and Tango, Brando&#39;s performance was disappointing for some reviewers, who accused him of giving an erratic and inconsistent performance. In 1977, Brando made a rare appearance on television in the miniseries <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0078678/\">Roots: The Next Generations (1979)</a>, portraying <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0734339/\">George Lincoln Rockwell</a>; he won a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Miniseries or a Movie for his performance. In 1978, he narrated the English version of <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0078140/\">Raoni (1978)</a>, a French-Belgian documentary film directed by Jean-Pierre Dutilleux and Luiz Carlos Saldanha that focused on the life of Raoni Metuktire and issues surrounding the survival of the indigenous Indian tribes of north central Brazil.<br/><br/>Later in his career, Brando concentrated on extracting the maximum amount of\ncapital for the least amount of work from producers, as when he got the\nSalkind brothers to pony up a then-record $3.7 million against 10% of\nthe gross for 13 days work on\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0078346/\">Superman (1978)</a>. Factoring in inflation,\nthe straight salary for &quot;Superman&quot; equals or exceeds the new record of\n$1 million a day <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000148/\">Harrison Ford</a> set\nwith\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0267626/\">K-19: The Widowmaker (2002)</a>. He agreed to the role only on assurance that he would be paid a large sum for what amounted to a small part, that he would not have to read the script beforehand, and his lines would be displayed somewhere off-camera. Brando also filmed scenes for the movie&#39;s sequel, Superman II, but after producers refused to pay him the same percentage he received for the first movie, he denied them permission to use the footage.<br/><br/>Before cashing his first paycheck for\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0078346/\">Superman (1978)</a>, Brando had picked up $2\nmillion for his extended cameo in\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000338/\">Francis Ford Coppola</a>&#39;s\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0078788/\">Apocalypse Now (1979)</a> in a role,\nthat of Col. Kurtz, that he authored on-camera through improvisation\nwhile Coppola shot take after take. It was Brando&#39;s last bravura star\nperformance. He co-starred with <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001715/\">George C. Scott</a> and <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000024/\">John Gielgud</a> in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0080754/\">The Formula (1980)</a>, but the film was another critical and financial failure. Years later though, he did receive an eighth and final Oscar nomination\nfor his supporting role in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0097243/\">A Dry White Season (1989)</a>\nafter coming out of a near-decade-long retirement. Contrary to those\nwho claimed he now only was in it for the money, Brando donated his\nentire seven-figure salary to an anti-apartheid charity. He then did an amusing performance in the comedy <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0099615/\">The Freshman (1990)</a>, winning rave reviews. He portrayed Tomas de Torquemada in the historical drama <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0103594/\">1492: Conquest of Paradise (1992)</a>, but his performance was denounced and the film was another box office failure. He made another comeback in the <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000136/\">Johnny Depp</a> romantic drama <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0112883/\">Don Juan DeMarco (1994)</a>, which co-starred <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0001159/\">Faye Dunaway</a> as his wife. He then appeared in <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0116654/\">The Island of Dr. Moreau (1996)</a>, co-starring <a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/name/nm0000174/\">Val Kilmer</a>, who he didn&#39;t get along with. The filming was an unpleasant experience for Brando, as well as another critical and box office failure.<br/><br/>Brando had first attracted media attention at the age of 24, when\n&quot;Life&quot; magazine ran a photo of himself and his sister Jocelyn, who were\nboth then appearing on Broadway. The curiosity continued, and\nsnowballed. Playing the paraplegic soldier of\n<a class=\"ipc-md-link ipc-md-link--entity\" href=\"/title/tt0042727/\">The Men (1950)</a>, Brando had gone to live\nat a Veterans Administration hospital with actual disabled veterans,\nand confined himself to a wheelchair for weeks. It was an acting\nmethod, research, that no one in Hollywood had ever heard of before,\nand that willingness to experience life.",
    "primaryImage": {
      "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTg3MDYyMDE5OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjgyNTEzNA@@._V1_.jpg",
      "width": 1023,
      "height": 792
    },
    "primaryProfessions": [
      {
        "category": {
          "text": "Actor"
        }
      },
      {
        "category": {
          "text": "Director"
        }
      },
      {
        "category": {
          "text": "Writer"
        }
      }
    ],
    "awards": {
      "nominations": 75,
      "wins": 36
    },
    "knownFor": [
      {
        "title": {
          "id": "tt0078788",
          "titleText": {
            "text": "Apocalypse Now"
          },
          "releaseYear": {
            "year": 1979
          }
        },
        "summary": {
          "principalCategory": {
            "text": "Actor"
          }
        }
      },
      {
        "title": {
          "id": "tt0068646",
          "titleText": {
            "text": "The Godfather"
          },
          "releaseYear": {
            "year": 1972
          }
        },
        "summary": {
          "principalCategory": {
            "text": "Actor"
          }
        }
      },
      {
        "title": {
          "id": "tt0047296",
          "titleText": {
            "text": "On the Waterfront"
          },
          "releaseYear": {
            "year": 1954
          }
        },
        "summary": {
          "principalCategory": {
            "text": "Actor"
          }
        }
      },
      {
        "title": {
          "id": "tt0044081",
          "titleText": {
            "text": "A Streetcar Named Desire"
          },
          "releaseYear": {
            "year": 1951
          }
        },
        "summary": {
          "principalCategory": {
            "text": "Actor"
          }
        }
      }
    ],
    "filmography": [
      {
        "category": "Director",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0055257",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "One-Eyed Jacks"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1961
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYzg3MWFmY2MtYmE5NC00MTA5LWI4YzUtMjVhNjJmY2U1MzkwXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Writer",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0056264",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Mutiny on the Bounty"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1962
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZDU4YTc4YjUtNTAyNC00MDM2LTg4M2UtZTdkZjRiYThjY2RlXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Actor",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt10905860",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Big Bug Man"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2006
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BM2YyYzdhZGUtNTdiZS00NGI2LWJiNzgtYjRhZDA2YjA1YjdmXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Mrs. Sour"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0442674",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "The Godfather"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2006
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BODc1OTAxMjktMTQ4NC00MTI3LThjNzEtY2MxMzUwODUzMjgxXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Don Vito Corleone"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt1667880",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Michael Jackson: You Rock My World"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2001
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjMxY2VjZmItNDAzNC00MGZhLTlmM2YtYWY5ZTNiZWI4YjFkXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Boss"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0227445",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "The Score"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2001
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZmI3Mjk4NGMtYjhmOC00NjYzLThhNWQtYWUwZDc3Y2ZkZTA1XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Max"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0120678",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Free Money"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1998
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYTIxNDAzNWYtN2E4ZS00M2QzLTgyZDAtZWNlMzI0YTRjZDJlXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "The Swede"
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Producer",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt4800292",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Lying for a Living"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2002
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BOThlNjUyZjMtNTFjOC00ZDM5LWFiZjYtNWU0NGEwMDlkZDFiXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Cinematographer",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt4332734",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Untitled Famine Relief Fund-Raising Documentary"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1967
              },
              "primaryImage": null
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Thanks",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt9777644",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Da 5 Bloods"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2020
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNjIwN2IxODEtNDhhMi00NDEwLWIwODEtYjIzZDVhZjg0Y2MyXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt1486556",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "An Actor's Life (Less Ordinary)"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2017
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZDEwMGU4MDUtZTcwMS00YzMxLWJkZTItZTY4NTJmZGY1NjBmXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt2699834",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Hollow Men"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2012
              },
              "primaryImage": null
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt1666348",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Vixen Highway 2006: It Came from Uranus!"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2010
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTkwMzMxNTQ1MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTI0OTM4NA@@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0961761",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "You Will Believe: The Cinematic Saga of Superman"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2006
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMzRkMTA0YzYtNDg2YS00Y2E4LWE2N2ItMDdlYTYwNzVjZmI5XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Soundtrack",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt5471826",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "MsMojo"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2016
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNGYzMGViNDUtMjM5Mi00YTA0LTkyOWUtZjZmMjc5MGY3Nzc2XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt4145178",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Listen to Me Marlon"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2015
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjEyNDQyMTc2NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjMzMTAwNjE@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0112456",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Barbra: The Concert"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1994
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTUxMTM1MjE4Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDU0NDUyMQ@@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0070849",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Last Tango in Paris"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1972
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYjkwYjdhM2ItZmVkMi00M2Y2LWJmNjEtN2Y2ZGU3MjdmZjE0XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0056632",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "The Ugly American"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1963
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BY2I1NjVjOGUtYWQ0Ny00MjI2LWJhNmYtMGU1MGVmNmYxMDRmXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Self",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt4800292",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Lying for a Living"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2002
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BOThlNjUyZjMtNTFjOC00ZDM5LWFiZjYtNWU0NGEwMDlkZDFiXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self - Host"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt37901115",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Telecom Italia - Marlon Brando"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2000
              },
              "primaryImage": null
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0088550",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Larry King Live"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1985
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZjM3NzFmMDgtOWVjZS00YmJiLTk3YjAtZThkZGEwOTNlNzNhXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self - Guest"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0373506",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Corazón, corazón"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1993
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMWU2MmQyZWMtZTg4Yy00MmVlLTlkZmYtOWQ3YTI1MDVhYTBmXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt0116993",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Marlon Brando: Wild One"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1994
              },
              "primaryImage": null
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "category": "Archive Footage",
        "credits": [
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt7336664",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Vremya"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1968
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYmIzMTdhMzktYTE5Ni00MWFiLWJkNWMtMDdlZTY4OWY4MTFjXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Don Vito Corleone (segment: The Godfather)"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt38672206",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "VOX Nachrichten"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 1993
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMmI0OWVkYmEtN2M1Ny00MGQzLThkMmUtZmFiZWRiZmQ1NWZjXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt33090947",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Buongiorno"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2024
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZDQzMDEwZjQtOGIyZC00YmYyLTlkNTMtYWZhY2VkYmU5NWVkXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt39601375",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Trend Reloaded - Wie Retro unsere Gegenwart prƤgt"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2025
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYmNiOWMzM2MtNDJhYy00MDg5LWFhZTgtNDU5YmM1M2JjZmFkXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": {
              "id": "tt4666458",
              "titleText": {
                "text": "Talking Pictures"
              },
              "releaseYear": {
                "year": 2013
              },
              "primaryImage": {
                "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjQ1NDJmMjktMmMzZi00MTA5LWJiNzktYTFmMTdkZDUzNGFiXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg"
              }
            },
            "characters": [
              "Self"
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}